Inferring Freedom And Equality
Inferring Freedom and Equality
Many of Earth?s organisms and processes depend on each other to survive the natural world. First of all,
freedom, or “forced to be free,” and equality presuppose each other in some instances, but sometimes they
are interdependent. For example, if you look into the lower class, people within that class are equal among
others in that class. Also, they have freedom inside the boundaries of their status quo. As the view
broadens to the whole society, that certain class loses some of its freedom and equality to the aristocracy.
In this example, the amount of freedom and equality you receive all depends on money and power. Wealth
corrupts the balance of freedom and equality between the social classes in the nation. In all, everyone in a
legitimate society has some equality and freedom, however, the how much you get relies on where you
stand in the social triangle.
In every valid government, every citizen has freedom of their basic rights, but the sense of equality will
never be distributed equally between them. This problem is constantly going to true because of the
definition of general will: an individual has to alienate some of his natural rights to join the body politic.
Therefore, power is distributed to the government, and the people of the nation are not equal. One person
will always have power over another. If everyone was equal, chaos would break out into the world,
because when nobody governs or rules the citizens, they can do whatever they please. Freedom is preferred
in the society rather than equality. A person with freedom would have most rights in the Constitution, but a
person with equality would live in a chaotic society, because there is no governing house. Altogether, the
presence of freedom and equality together differs with the scope of the condition.
America?s concepts of freedom and equality have varied over the course of its history. When the American